Showing posts with label dividend. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dividend. Show all posts

Sunday, July 19, 2020

Long Term Charts - Thai Stock Market (Thai SET) Update - July 2020

It's been a long time since I've not provided an update to long term charts of the Thai stock market. More exactly over 5 years, because to be honest nothing much happened during those years, but we've got a bit more action this year, so it might be a good time to have another look.

Long Term Chart Thai SET 1976 - 2020

The Thai stock market peaked at around 1,830 in February 2018, and it dropped to under 1,200 in March following the politician answers and lockdowns due to COVID-19. It's back to around 1,350 since them It was a sharp, but let's check more long term charts to find out more about valuations.
Thai SET PER - 1976 - 2020

One metric is the price earning ratio, and never really went under 10 that historically is a buying opportunity. Getting to 5 or under would be a lifetime buying opportunity, but obviously it does not happen often. We should also expect earnings to drop significantly, and I'm not convinced they'll recoever that quickly so the PER should soon go higher, unless the average price of stocks in the Thai SET goes down as well.


Thai SET Price-to-Book Value - 1988 - 2020

The price to book value ratio is fairly affordable, so that's one metric where the Thai SET looks fair valued or even slightly inexpensive.

Thai SET Dividend Yield - 1988 to 2020

From the chart above, a dividend yield of just under 4% look attractive considering current interest rate on fixed deposits are under 1%. Buying large stocks for dividends might be a good way to be paid to wait with limited downside. That would remain true as long as dividends are not cut, and that's not guaranteed considering the environment we live in.

But no buying on my side for now, so I'll be patient, and since I expect the market to move again this year, I'll likely post an update in December.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Long Term Charts Thai Stock Market - January 2013 Update

This is a repost of the article found on CNX Translation forums.

6 months have gone since our last update, and its time again to update the long term charts of the Thai stock market.

The first chart is the SET index between 1975 and January 2013. Following other indices around the world, and despite my overvaluation view 6 months ago, the Thai stock market has continued its (unstoppable) rise in the last 6 months, and now stands at about 1440, a rise of about 40% since I started to become cautious.

Image

The PER is now around 18, mainly due to the stock market improvement. At 15, I started to be bearish, so at 18 it's extremely unusual for the Thai stock market. So either earnings have to go up substantially, either the stock market has to plunge, or a combination of the two.
Image

The price to book value slowly crept up to 2.4 which also starts to make Thai stocks overvalued, especially compared to what you get in other markets around the world. (European stocks have a P/B ratio around 1 now)
Image

To conclude, I believe the Thai stock market is relatively overvalued both historically, and compared to other stocks markets around the world. The dividend yield is now around 3% which is is that more than can get in a fixed deposit (Bangkok Bank now offers up to 2.65 % p.a for a 36 months fixed deposit), so why take the risk? There is also a lot of optimism around the world, which IMHO is not warranted, so I would not be surprised to see a massive correction in the Thai stock market within the next year.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Marc Faber April 2012 Market Commentary

Marc Faber has just released his April 2012 market commentary on the gloomboomdoom.com website.

This month report is entitled "He had been one of those People who was greatly improved by Death".

This month, there are 2 MMC attachments:
  • Stocks, Bonds, and the Efficacy of Global Dividends by Jim O´Shaughness, chairman, and CEO of O'Shaughnessy Asset Management,
  • Value Subjectivism and Monetary Instability by Ron Herafounder of Hera Research, LLC.
The first report by Jim O'Shaughness is available as a free download at http://osam.com/research.aspx (January 2012 research paper) after registration. In this report, Jim O'Shaugness looks at bonds and stocks investing as well as global dividend investing. He compares different strategies over a long(-ish) period of time. Here's the conclusion of this study:
Bonds seem poised for low single-digit returns and, potentially, negative real returns. A conservative analysis of historical equity returns leads us to believe that equities could see mid to high single-digit nominal equity returns, though still below average. Dividend investing has historically been a reliable strategy producing superior excess returns in both U.S. and foreign markets. Expanding the universe of potential investments to include a global framework provides a greater opportunity set of high-quality, cash-rich multi-national companies with strong dividend yields.

Dividends are historically a significant component of total equity returns during low-return environments. When applied to pre- and post-tax income investors, a high-yield dividend strategy not only offers protection of purchasing power but also growth of income on a real basis.
The second attachment "Value Subjectivism and Monetary Instability" is an article published on Goldseek.com where Ron Hera pinpoint 15 fundamental issues with fiat currencies.

If you want to access the full Monthly Market Commentary (MMC) by Marc Faber, it is available for 300 USD per year. Sometimes, Summaries or highlights are available on the web, I'll repost it here if one become available.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Marc Faber Picks at 2012 Barron's Roundtable

The first month of the year is time for Barron's roudtable. There were 10 panelists for 2012:

  • Scoot Black - Delphi Management
  • Fred Hickey - The High Street Strategist
  • Abby Joseph Cohen - Global Markets Institutes
  • Brian Rogers - T. Rowe Price
  • Marc Faber - The Gloom, Doom & Boom Report
  • Meryl Witmer - Eagle Capital Partners
  • Mario Gabelli - Gamco Investors Inc.
  • Oscar Schafer - O.S.S. Capital Management
  • Bill Gross - Pimco
  • Felix Zulauf - Zulauf Asset Management
They discussed their views on the economy and markets and gave their picks for 2012.

Here are Marc Faber's Picks for 2012:

Investment/Ticker Price 1/6/12
Big-Cap Stocks
Total / TOT$50.75
Nestlé / NESN.Switzerland54.00 CHF
Novartis / NVS$57.31
Pfizer / PFE21.57
Singapore
SATS / SATS.SingaporeS$2.23
K-REIT Asia Management / KREIT.Singapore0.89
StarHub / STH.Singapore2.9
Wing Tai Holdings / WINGT.Singapore0.99
Fraser & Neave / FNN.Singapore6.35
Hong Kong
Sun Hung Kai Properties / 16.Hong KongHK$98.20
Swire Pacific / 19.Hong Kong75.45
Hang Seng Bank / 11.Hong Kong92.9
India
India Capital Fund*$66.24
Short
International Business Machines / IBM$182.54
Salesforce.com / CRM101.06
Australian dollar A$1=$1.02
*Price of A shares as of 9/30/2011.
Source: Bloomberg

Here's the part of Barron's Roundtable where he explains his long picks:

Faber: My preference is asset diversification, as we don't know how much money governments will print, the size of fiscal deficits and so forth. The biggest uncertainty is what will happen to the Chinese economy. The Chinese probably can continue to muddle through, easing interest rates again to keep things up. But we're dealing with an economy driven by capital spending, which is driven by credit, which wasn't the case until 2008.


Faber: There is a huge amount of underground lending throughout Asia. Mr. Bernanke can drop his dollar bills on the U.S., but the growth in dollars here can lead to strong economic growth and inflation in other countries. That has happened in the past few years. I am the most bearish person you can imagine on earth, which is why I recommend putting, say, 25% of your money in equities, 25% in precious metals, 25% in cash and bonds and 25% in real estate. These assets won't go up substantially this year, but they could preserve your wealth.

People say large-capitalization stocks are inexpensive, and I agree. I would buy a basket of high-quality big-caps in Europe and the U.S. You can by Total [TOT], in France, which yields more than 5%, and Nestlé [NESN.Switzerland] and Novartis [NVS] and Pfizer [PFE]. These stocks don't have huge downside risk. Because emerging markets saw big declines last year, you could also buy SATS [SATS.Singapore], in Singapore, which provides catering services to the airline industry and ports. It yields 5% and trades for 13 times earnings. I also like K-REIT Asia Management [KREIT.Singapore], a real-estate investment trust that yields 7%. The stock has fallen by about 50% and the dividend might be cut. But even if it is cut to 4%, this is an OK investment. These stocks won't go up right away, but reinvesting dividends will yield an adequate return over time. StarHub [STH.Singapore], the mobile-phone company, yields 6.9% and the P/E is 14.

Zulauf: If China decelerates sharply, won't markets like Singapore have another big hit?

Faber: The question is, to what extent has that been discounted already? They could fall another 20%, but a luxury-property developer like Wing Tai Holdings [WINGT.Singapore] already sells for half its book value. I am positive about Singapore in the long run because more Europeans are moving there, and to Hong Kong. Because of banking-secrecy laws it is probably safer to have a bank account in Singapore than Europe.
The Hong Kong market was hit hard, and stocks haven't bottomed yet. But you can buy Sun Hung Kai Properties [16.Hong Kong], with a P/E of five and a yield of 3.5%. Swire Pacific [19.Hong Kong] is a blue-chip, a well-managed conglomerate. It yields almost 5% and the P/E is 11. Hang Seng Bank [11.HK] yields 5.6% and trades for 11 times earnings. There isn't a huge risk in these stocks, but maybe I'm too bullish.

and his short picks:

Faber: IBM [IBM] is a good short. It is the back office of the world. There is room for earnings disappointment. If China implodes, the Australian dollar will go downwhill. That's another short. A third is Salesforce.com [CRM], which I recommended shorting in the June Roundtable ["Buy Low, Stay Nimble," June 13, 2011].


Faber: Order, order. I haven't finished. Fraser & Neave [FNN.Singapore], in Singapore, is a conglomerate similar to Swire. It sells for 10 times earnings and yields about 3%. It could become a takeover target at some point. Lastly, I am the chairman of the India Capital Fund [an open-end fund sold outside the U.S.]. The fund and the Indian currency have been hit hard, and the fund could go lower. But the U.S. outperformed India last year on the order of 40%, and the Indian market looks attractive at 12 times earnings. As Chen Zhao at BCA Research said, in China the macro backdrop is fantastic and the micro is a disaster, but in India the macro is a disaster and the micro is fantastic. India has very good companies. The fund is overweight the banks and has a P/E of 10.
Last year I was overweight the U.S. relative to emerging economies. At what stage will the outperformance of the U.S. cease and emerging markets rise again? It could be three or six months, or a year. I am gradually increasing my exposure to emerging markets. Thai and Indian banks have no exposure to Europe. Indian banks lend domestically.

Why is the Indian economy having trouble?
 
Faber: Money-printing in the U.S. created food and energy inflation. In poor countries the percentage of per capita income spent on food and energy is much higher than in advanced societies.

Faber: Yes. Credit was growing rapidly and the hangover period could last for a while but these markets are good long-term investments. I travel extensively in these countries and you can see the growth of economic development. People go from bicycles to motorcycles, and from motorcycles to cars. First-time buyers of cars jump socially, as do first-time buyers of homes. Thailand has several consumer-credit companies. Buyers will do everything to pay off their loans. They aren't going to walk away. Plus, bankruptcy laws are tough.
Hedge funds performed badly last year, with few exceptions. Why is that? The bond market was strong, gold was up 11% and the U.S. market was flat, but sectors such as utilities did well. This year the economy could contract and stocks could go ballistic as central banks print money. If investors are diversified, they might do all right.

If you are interested in the full Barron's roundtable transcript and have the time to go thru the 9 pages, you can do so by reading the article Listen Up, Class: Here's How to Profit.